United States v. Huet-Vaughn

53. I disagree with the majority’s rationale in this case. I would hold that it was error for the military judge to prevent Captain (CPT) Huet-Vaughn from explaining her state of mind at the time she left her unit. United States v. Huff, 7 USCMA 247, 250, 22 CMR 37, 40 (1956) (“[A]n accused cannot be denied every opportunity to present evidence at the trial to negate the existence of every element of the offense charged.”).

54. Under our case law CPT Huet-Vaughn’s mental processes were relevant to determine whether she had an intent to avoid hazardous duty or shirk important service as…