Legal Opinion
United States v. Daniel Dean Hepperle
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided March 25, 1987No. 86-1675-SIPublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CONMY, District Judge.
Daniel Dean Hepperle appeals his convictions for interstate transportation of stolen property and concealing stolen property which had moved in interstate commerce, knowing it to be stolen. 18 U.S.C. §§ 2314, 2315. Mr. Hepperle alleges on appeal that searches by law enforcement officials violated his fourth amendment rights, and that the fruits of those searches must therefore be suppressed. Mr. Hepperle also contends that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict.
Facts
Daniel Goode raises birds in rural Selma, Alabama, and sells them commercially. In September,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- United States v. Barbara E. Stefonek, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Solomon Philip Panitz, United States of America v. Andrew Stewart BaumwaldCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Pamela Jean GanttCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Michael McMonagle v. Northeast Women's Center, IncSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. Robert James RitchieCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.