Legal Opinion

Brady v. Park

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided April 18, 2013No. 20110208-CAPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

VOROS, Judge:

T 1 This is a dispute over a $675,000 promissory note. The note was amortized over thirty years, but a balloon payment was due in about ten years. Although Appellees (the Bradys) made every monthly payment for nearly ten years-albeit some late-Appellants (Park) won a judgment against them for more than $2.4 million.

T2 On appeal, both parties contest the trial court's reading of the note. For different reasons, both challenge the trial court's ruling with respect to compound interest. In addition, Park challenges the trial court's refusal to enforce the note's 10% late fee,…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. State v. DunnUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. HolgateUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  3. 438 Main Street v. Easy Heat, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. CarterUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  5. WebBank v. American General Annuity Service Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2002

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Brady v. ParkUtah Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Wohnoutka v. KelleyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
  3. Bonner County v. Western InsuranceUtah Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Schreib v. WhitmerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016
  5. Stein Eriksen Lodge v. MX TechnologiesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API