Legal Opinion

White v. Arthur Murray, Inc.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1976No. 14286-14290PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TUCKETT, Justice:

The plaintiffs appeal from an order of the district court dismissing their complaints on the ground that the court had not acquired jurisdiction over the defendant. While the plaintiffs filed separate complaints, each alleging cause of action for fraud against the defendant, the ruling complained of by the district court is common to each case and is dealt with here as though it were one appeal. Plaintiffs are residents of Salt Lake County and filed their separate complaints in the District Court of Salt Lake County and caused service of summons to be made upon the defendant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hill v. Zale CorporationUtah Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Foreign Study League v. Holland-America LineUtah Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Union Ski Company v. Union Plastics CorporationUtah Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Dunham-Bush, Inc. v. Bill Hartmann Plumbing & Heating, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1973

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Campos Enterprises, Inc. v. Edwin K. Williams & Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Glover v. Western Air Lines, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. POHL, INC. OF AMERICA v. WebelhuthCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2007
  4. POHL, INC. OF AMERICA v. WebelhuthCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API