Legal Opinion

In re A.D.N.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 3, 2013No. COA13-709PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEER, Judge.

Respondent mother appeals from the trial court’s order terminating her parental rights to A.D.N. (“Andy”).1 On appeal, respondent mother argues that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the termination of parental rights (“TPR”) proceeding because petitioner, Andy’s paternal grandmother, lacked standing to file the TPR petition. We hold that the trial court properly concluded that Andy resided with petitioner for a continuous period of two years prior to the filing of the petition, such that petitioner had standing under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7B-1103(a)(5) (2011).…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lane v. ScarboroughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  2. Lee Ray Bergman Real Estate Rentals v. North Carolina Fair Housing CenterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  3. In re E.T.S.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  4. In re B.O.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re A.L.Z.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  2. In re J.A.U.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
  3. In re M.J.M.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2021
  4. In re M.J.M. & A.M.M.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2021
  5. In re Z.D.N.T.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API