Greenman v. McVey
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in tbe district court for Goodhue county against William McVey individually and as administrator with the will annexed of the estate of Hugh Vallely, deceased, to recover $423.29. In his answer defendant denied that James H. Vallely, son of the testator, had any interest in the land left by the testator at his decease under the will mentioned in the opinion or otherwise; denied that the pretended levy of attachment or execution by plaintiff was of any effect; alleged…
Read the full summary
Action in tbe district court for Goodhue county against William McVey individually and as administrator with the will annexed of the estate of Hugh Vallely, deceased, to recover $423.29. In his answer defendant denied that James H. Vallely, son of the testator, had any interest in the land left by the testator at his decease under the will mentioned in the opinion or otherwise; denied that the pretended levy of attachment or execution by plaintiff was of any effect; alleged that defendant was the owner of the share of said James in the estate of his father by virtue of a written assignment of…
1Opinion of the CourtBunn, J.
February 12, 1901, Hugh Vallely, a resident of Goodhue county, made his will. After directing the payment of his debts and funeral expenses, the testator gave, devised and bequeathed to his wife during her natural life his real estate consisting of a tract of 160 acres, and another 10-acre tract, and his personal property. Then follows this language: “And after her death and within two years thereafter, I give and bequeath to the oldest son, Thomas M. Vallely, $100; to John O. Vallely, the second son, $100; to Peter J. Vallely, third son, $600; to Mary A. Vallely, $900; to Kate A. Vallely,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- In re Estate of WalkerlyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Harrington v. PierWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- Dodge v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1879
- Underwood v. . CurtisNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Becker v. ChesterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In re Estate of SanfordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- Johrden v. PondSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Will of Schilling v. SchillingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- In Re Estate of HenckeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- Kietzer v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.