Diebel v. Spitzley & Widenman Construction Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Certiorari to Industrial Accident Board. Henry Diebel, personally, and as guardian of Eunice and Clara Diebel, presented his claim for compensation against the Spitzley & Widenman Construction Company for the accidental death of his son in defendant’s employ. On petition of the Chicago Bonding & Insurance Company, and another, insurers, to be relieved from further payments under an award. From an order denying the petition, defendants bring certiorari.
1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.
This case comes here by certiorari to the industrial accident board for review of an order made by it on January 29, 1919, denying a petition by defendant Chicago Bonding & Insurance Company to be relieved from making further payments of compensation in the case, ordering accrued compensation paid to the amount of $184.50, and continuance of payment of $4.50 a week in accordance with an award *620made by a committee of arbitration on September 20, 1916. The case is somewhat peculiar in an indicated confusion of parties and misunderstanding of facts which seems to run even to the names of the…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Smith v. Port Huron Gas & Electric Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922
- Smith v. Pontiac Motor Car Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Jones v. St. Joseph Iron WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
- Stice v. Consolidated Indiana Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1940
- Martilla v. Quincy Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1923
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.