Legal Opinion

ASA Enterprise, Inc. v. Stan Boyett & Son, Inc.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided February 3, 2023No. 1:21-cv-00915Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ASA ENTERPRISE, INC. and MANJIT Case No. 1:21-cv-00915-CDB SINGH, 12 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ EX- Plaintiffs/Counterclaim PARTE, UNOPPOSED APPLICATION TO 13 Defendants, APPROVE STIPULATION AND RETAIN JURISDICTION OVER SETTLEMENT 14 v. (Doc. 44) 15 STAN BOYETT & SON, INC., 16 Defendant/Counter Complainant. 17 18 Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ ex-parte, unopposed application seeking an order of 19 this Court approving the parties’ stipulation for entry of judgment and retaining jurisdiction after 20…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. Jessup, Goble v. Luther, RobertCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  4. Tur v. YouTube, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Kay v. Board of Educ. of City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API