Legal Opinion

Carr v. Cobble

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 21, 1924No. 10791PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMcNEILL, C. J.

This action was commenced in the district court of Garvin county by L. G. Cobble and Ada Cobble, his wife, against H. M. Carr to recover damages for wrongful attachment of and selling certain personal property under said attachment, and against Marion Henderson, surety on the attachment bond.

The plaintiffs alleged, in substance, that in 1916 H. M. Carr commenced a suit in the justice court of Pauls Valley township in Garvin county, before John W. Scott, a justice of the peace, against I. C. Cobble and had issued a purported writ of attachment which was levied upon the household' goods of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pettis v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. FosterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Continental Ins. Co. v. ChanceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Trotter v. WoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bingenheimer v. Holcomb & Hoke Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API