Boles v. Bank of Knoxville
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
*14MEMORANDUM
ROBERT L. TAYLOR, Chief Judge.
James Durelle Boles and his wife, Chlorine, have sued the defendants for a deprivation of rights. The plaintiffs assert jurisdiction under the Fourteenth Amendment, the Civil Rights Acts (specifically 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983', 1985 and 1986) and 28 U.S.C. § 1343. All the defendants have moved to dismiss the complaint because it does not state a claim upon which any relief can be granted. All of the defendants, with the exception of Hamilton S. Burnett, the Chief Justice of the Tennessee Supreme Court, also claim this Court has no jurisdiction to hear the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Screws v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Snowden v. HughesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Basista v. WeirCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
- Angelynn York v. Ron Story and Louis MorenoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Moyer v. PeabodySupreme Court of the United States · 1909
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Phillips v. FisherDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1977