Legal Opinion

Reilly v. Hanagan

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 25, 1920No. 9568. [fn*]Published

1Opinion

On Motion for Rehearing.

Counsel for plaintiff in error present ' a vigorous and persuasive motion for rehearing, but we do not see our way clear to grant it. It is sometimes difficult to determine just when a party' to .a judgment is a necessary party to an appeal, but to say the least of it the defendants Hugh Reilly, Jr., and Edward Reilly, are so intimately connected with the issues involved in this litigation as to render it advisable to'have them before this court before undertaking to render judgment on either the plaintiff in error’s assignments of error or the cross-assignments of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Barnard v. TarletonTexas Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Curlin v. Canadian & American Mortgage & Trust Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Farmers' & Merchants' National Bank v. Waco Electric Railway & Light Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API