Legal Opinion

Emory v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided March 5, 1973No. Docket No. 1330-71Unpublished

The petitioner, a psychiatric resident, received stipends from the Terrell State Hospital during the period of his residency. The stipends granted to the petitioner represent compensation for present or future services that were subject to the direction or supervision of the grantor. Held, the stipends are not excludable scholarships or fellowship grants. Sec. 117(a), I.R.C. 1954.

1Opinion of the Court

EMERSON EMORY, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Emory v. Commissioner

Docket No. 1330-71.

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1973-55; 1973 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 233; 32 T.C.M. (CCH) 245; T.C.M. (RIA) 73055;

March 5, 1973, Filed

The petitioner, a psychiatric resident, received stipends from the Terrell State Hospital during the period of his residency. The stipends granted to the petitioner represent compensation for present or future services that were subject to the direction or supervision of the grantor. Held, the stipends are not excludable scholarships or fellowship…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bingler v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Proskey v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1969
  3. Turem v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1970
  4. Haley v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1970
  5. Kwass v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API