Legal Opinion

Taylor v. United States

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided May 26, 2021No. 2:20-cv-00986Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ARTEMUS TAYLOR Petitioner-defendant, v. 2255 Case No. 20-C-986 Criminal Case No. 13-CR-164 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Respondent-plaintiff. DECISION AND ORDER Petitioner-defendant Artemus Taylor filed a pro se motion to vacate his conviction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, raising a claim under United States v. Davis,

139 S. Ct. 2319

(2019), and to reduce his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c), based on extraordinary circumstances due to the COVID-19 pandemic. For the reasons that follow, I deny the motion in its entirety. I.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  3. Juan Almonacid v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  4. Jeffery Harris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  5. Christopher McCoy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API