Legal Opinion

VFW Post 8586 v. Ohio Liquor Control Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 19, 1998No. Nos. 97-1383 and 97-1384PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCook, J.

The issue certified to this court is “[wjhether, mere possession of gambling devices [on liquor permit premises] violates Ohio Adm.Code 4301:1-1-53.” In its briefing of the issue and at oral argument, however, the commission has conceded that possession of a gambling device on liquor permit premises, without more, does not constitute a violation of the administrative regulation. It is clear from a simple reading of the administrative regulation that the commission’s concession is proper. Ohio Adm.Code 4301:1-1-53(B) states:

“No person authorized to sell alcoholic beverages shall have, harbor,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Ohio Historical Society v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Garono v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Mills-Jennings of Ohio, Inc. v. Department of Liquor ControlOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Abdoney v. Board of Liquor ControlOhio Court of Appeals · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Big Bob's, Inc. v. Ohio Liquor Control CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Bartchy v. State Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Washington County Home v. Ohio Department of HealthOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Santa v. Ohio Department of Human ServicesOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Denuit v. Ohio State Bd. of PharmacyOhio Court of Appeals · 2013

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API