Legal Opinion

Van Hoosen v. First Nat. Bank

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 26, 1991No. 90-104PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

583 So.2d 106 (1991)

Ronald VAN HOOSEN, et ux., Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ST. MARTIN, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 90-104.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

June 26, 1991.

Onebane, Donohoe, Bernard, Torian, Diaz, McNamara & Abell, James M. Wilkerson, Lafayette, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Guidry & Guidry, Daniel G. Guidry, St. Martinville, for First Nat. Bank of St. Martin.

Roy, Forrest & Lopresto, L. Albert Forrest, New Iberia, for State Farm.

Before DOMENGEAUX, FORET and DOUCET, JJ.

DOUCET, Judge.

Ronald and Patsy Van Hoosen, depositors of First National Bank of St. Martin,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Watkins v. Bank of Morgan City & Trust Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1935
  2. Haik v. RowleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1979
  3. Nolan J. Cunningham Apartments, Inc. v. DupreLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. A Confidential Limousine Service, Inc. v. London Livery, Ltd.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1993
  2. Guillot v. Union BankLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. Mahler v. First National Bank of HoumaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. LeGrand v. DashSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API