In re the Arbitration Between Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance & Malatino
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
McCarthy, J. (dissenting).
Because respondent Marcia Malatino (hereinafter respondent) did not sustain injuries arising out of the ownership, maintenance or use of a motor vehicle, petitioner was entitled to a stay of arbitration.1 Respondent’s coworker parked his pickup truck in the employer’s parking lot in the morning and apparently intended to leave the vehicle there for his entire eight-hour shift. If respondent had walked into the parked truck itself, her injuries would not have arisen out of the use of the vehicle (see Wooster v Soriano, 167 AD2d 233, 234 [1990]; McConnell v Fireman’s…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Walton v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America, Inc. v. SchaeferNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- McConnell v. Fireman's Fund American InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- United Services Automobile Ass'n v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Rowell v. Utica Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.