Legal Opinion

Deigendesch v. County of Bucks

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 27, 1984No. 121, 122 and 126PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LARSEN, Justice.

In this consolidated appeal of first impression, we are called upon to interpret the Act of 1966, Jan. 13, P.L. (1965) 1292, § 1, et seq., as amended, 16 P.S. § 11941, et seq. commonly referred to as Act. 515.1 The relevant provisions of the act in question provide:

Covenant for farm, forest, water supply or open space uses

All counties of the first, second, second A, third or fourth class are hereby authorized to enter into covenants with owners of land designated as farm, forest, water supply, or open space land on an adopted municipal, county or regional plan for the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lehigh Valley Cooperative Farmers v. Commonwealth, Bureau of Employment Security Department of Labor & IndustrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Cedarbrook Realty, Inc. v. Board of Assessment AppealsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. West Allegheny Hospital v. Board of Property Assessment, Appeals & ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Deigendesch v. County of BucksCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Annenberg v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Hanoverian, Inc. v. Lehigh County Board of AssessmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Connor v. Westmoreland County Board of Assessment AppealCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Feick v. Berks County Board of Assessment AppealsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Hydrusko v. County of MonroeCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API