Legal Opinion

City of Austin v. Lamas

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided March 10, 2005No. 03-04-00034-CVPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

W. KENNETH LAW, Chief Justice.

In this case, we examine a governmental unit’s liability under the Tort Claims Act because of the condition of a stop sign. A tort allegedly occurred when a city bus ran a stop sign that was obscured by tree branches. The City of Austin argues that sovereign immunity bars tort liability unless it had actual notice of the traffic sign’s condition. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 101.060(a)(2) (West 1997). Because Lamas did not plead actual notice and because discovery revealed that the City did not have actual notice of the condition of the sign, the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Texas Department of Parks & Wildlife v. MirandaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Bland Independent School District v. BlueTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Mayhew v. Town of SunnyvaleTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  5. County of Cameron v. BrownTexas Supreme Court · 2002

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. City of Austin v. Rangel, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006
  2. Texas Department of Transportation v. Olivares, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010
  3. Nairn v. Killeen Independent School District, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2012
  4. Fort Bend County Toll Road Authority v. Olivares, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010
  5. America Tirado v. the City of El Paso, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2012

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API