Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Hunt v. Heil

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1951No. 28,774PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

On October 20, 1950, this court refused to issue an alternative writ of mandate on the petition of this relator because the relator’s petition was insufficient under Rule 2-35. See State ex rel. Hunt v. Orange Circuit Court (1950), 228 Ind. 576, 94 N. E. 2d 545.

On January 20, 1951, the relator filed another petition for writ of mandate, which seems to seek the same , relief. It, too, wholly fails to comply, or attempt to comply, with Rule :2-35, and the issuance of an alternative writ is, therefore, denied.

Note.—Reported in 96 N. E. 2d 337.

DECISION ON AMENDED PETITION

DRAPER, J.

On October 20,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Earl v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1926
  2. State Ex Rel. Fulton v. SchannenIndiana Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Thompson v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1937
  4. State Ex Rel. Hunt v. Orange Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1950

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Spangler v. United States Rubber Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1962
  2. State ex rel. Shrum v. HallIndiana Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Guthrie v. BLAKELYIndiana Court of Appeals · 1955
  4. Guthrie v. BLAKELYIndiana Court of Appeals · 1955
  5. State ex rel. Shrum v. HallIndiana Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API