Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Department of the Treasury

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided January 4, 2010No. 2009-3155PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MICHEL, Chief Judge.

William Armstrong filed an untimely petition for review with the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB), seeking review of the Administrative Judge’s (AJ’s) decision dismissing his case under a settlement agreement. The MSPB declined to decide Armstrong’s petition for review, finding that, because Armstrong’s new evidence of fraud in the procurement of the agreement was insufficient to render the agreement invalid, it would not excuse the untimeliness of his petition. Because the MSPB improperly conflated the issue of timeliness with the ultimate decision on the merits of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Armstrong v. GeithnerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. GeithnerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
  2. Ramey v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
  3. Valerie S. Turner v. Department of the Interior, Merit Systems Protection Board2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API