Morgan v. Hutcheson
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Grice, Justice.
In view of what the defendant pleaded, it can not be urged by him or his counsel that the money received by him was for services rendered in connection with obtaining administration on the estate of the husband of the plaintiff. He is bound by his pleadings, which averred that he received it as a gift. Kirkpatrick v. Faw, 184 Ga. 170, 177-178 (190 S. E. 566), and cit.: Fowler v. Johnson, 151 Ga. 122 (106 S. E. 90).
The Court of Appeals ruled that the jury was authorized to find the money was not paid under the contract, “and the verdict was authorized on the theory on which the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Calhoun v. MassieSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Spicer v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Margolin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Hines v. SteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Morgan v. HutchesonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943