Marshall v. State

Gardner, Presiding Judge.

We have set out the evidence in detail. It is sufficient to sustain the verdict of the jury as to .the general grounds.

Special ground 1 assigns error because the court refused to charge the jury the law covering the testimony of accomplices, after the same had been requested in writing. The witness Carroll is the alleged accomplice. Counsel for the defendant has cited many cases' concerning the principle of law that a defendant cannot be convicted on uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice. After a careful study of the record before us it is our opinion that the…