Lilienthal v. Ballou
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County and from an order denying a new trial. E. P. TJnangst, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.
This is an action for the recovery of personal property, brought against the sheriff Ballou, and Orman, an attaching creditor. Defendants appeal from the judgment and from an order refusing a new trial. The property was levied upon under a writ of attachment against Phillips Brothers & Co.
On and prior to September 8, 1896, Phillips Brothers & Co. were engaged in merchandising at Arroyo Grande, in San Luis Obispo county. At that time their property was attached by *185various creditors, and remained under attachment until October 23, 1896, when it was released in pursuance of an agreement made…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- George v. PierceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
3Cited by9 opinions
- Staff Mortgage and Investment Corporation v. WikleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Sequeira v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- In Re Bruce Farley CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Grand Avenue Bank v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1909
- O'Connor v. O'Connor, Rice & BarnesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.