Consolidated School Dist. No. 73 v. Ellison
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
RUTH, C.
Parties hereto will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.
Plaintiff entered into a contract to do certain plumbing necessary for a school building being erected by defendants, who awarded the contract to a general contractor, under whom plaintiff did certain work according to plans and specifications, which called for sewers, pipes, etc., to extend eight feet from the main building. Teachers’ cottages and a janitors’ cottage were also .constructed, and the work on the school building does not enter into this action. Defendants found it necessary to construct a…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Daviess County v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Bloomfield v. Charter Oak BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Gaar, Scott & Co. v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Beard v. HerndonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Foreman v. NeedlesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.