Legal Opinion

Earl Vest and Fay Vest, Petitioners-Appellees-Cross v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent-Appellant-Cross

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 8, 1973No. 72-2283PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEWIN, Circuit Judge:

This appeal is from a decision of the Tax Court holding (1) that the grant of underground water rights by taxpayers, Earl and Fay Vest, was a sale and the proceeds were entitled to capital gains treatment and (2) that payments received by the Vests for the grant of various surface rights incident to a mineral lease were in the nature of rent and hence were taxable as ordinary income. The Commissioner appeals from the Tax Court’s characterization of the proceeds from the water rights grant and the taxpayers cross-appeal from the ruling on the surface rights payments. We…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Palmer v. BenderSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Burton-Sutton Oil Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Commissioner v. Southwest Exploration Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. Crowell Land and Mineral Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  5. Nathaniel C. Wood and Gertrude L. Wood v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Long Term Capital Holdings v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2004
  2. Associated Wholesale Grocers, Inc., and Its Subsidiary, Super Market Developers, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  3. Yamamoto v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1980
  4. Fasken v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1979
  5. Deskins v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1986

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API