Legal Opinion

English v. Thomas

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 25, 1915No. 4145PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error from Superior Court, Muskogee County; Farrar L. McCain, Judge. Action by Clarence F. Thomas against Albert Z. English. Judgment for the plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RITTENHOUSE, C.

The facts disclosed by the record are: That plaintiff, Clarence F. Thomas, in April, 1906, was engaged in delivering the Muskogee Daily Phoenix, a morning -newspaper published in Muskogee, Okla.; that on his route was a building situated at the corner of Main and Broadway streets, known as the English Building, the property of Albert Z. English, the defendant; that it was occupied by various tenants, principally lawyers, most of whom were subscribers to the paper delivered by plaintiff and to whose offices plaintiff under contract delivered papers each morning; there…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Plummer v. DillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  3. Glaser v. RothschildSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  4. Phillips v. Library Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1893
  5. Gordon v. CummingsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Huus v. RingoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Pruitt v. TimmeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  3. Thorn v. ConeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Jackson v. LandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  5. S. H. Kress & Co. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API