Legal Opinion

Bamberger v. American Surety Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1905PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action by assignee of claim against decedent’s estate upon the official bond of an administrator. The opinion state* the case.

1Opinion of the CourtGarretson, J.

The language of section 2607 of the Code should not be construed according to the strict letter thereof; and so that no person having an interest in the enforcement of the surrogate’s decree, can maintain an action upon the official bond of an administrator other than the person in whose favor the decree was made.

Assuming that the allegations of fact set forth in the complaint are true and gathering therefrom every inference most favorable to the plaintiff, it appears among other things that the plaintiff is the owner, by assignment from Charles G. Gall, of a claim against the estate of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hood v. . HoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Campbell v. . FosterNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  3. Prentiss v. WeatherlyNew York Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bamberger v. American Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API