Legal Opinion

Detroit Lumber Co. v. Arbitter

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1930No. Docket No. 18, Calendar No. 34,916PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

From decree entered in accordance with, the following opinion of the trial judge, defendants John Arbitter and Lydia Arbitter and the city of Detroit prosecute appeal:

“On February 26, 1894, Jane K. Norris Joy held the title in fee simple to the following land then situated in the village of Norris in this county, and subsequently incorporated within the limits of the city of Detroit:
“ ‘All that part of the east % of the southwest % of section 9 of township 1 S., R. 12 east, that is situate south of the center of tho boulevard (now known as Davison avenue) and east of the right-of-way of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Martin v. HamlinMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Rathke v. TylerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  3. McComb v. GilkesonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1909
  4. Newberry v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Koch v. BirdMichigan Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Blanchard v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Browne v. Briggs Commercial & Development Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Detroit Edison Co. v. MalburgDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API