Legal Opinion

Potter v. Pikeville National Bank

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided April 18, 1933PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Richardson

— Affirming.

This is an action to settle the estate of A. B. Potter. His widow qualified as administratrix and as such, she and the heirs at law were named defendants. They were duly summoned before the rendition of the judgment, directing the sale of the property of the .deceased for the purpose of paying his debts. The action was referred to the master commissioner with directions to audit and settle the estate of the deceased. He reported the liabilities, including a note of A. B. Potter, dated June 11, 1928, payable to Andrew J. Potter for $500, with…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ewell v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
  2. Whitaker v. HolcombCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  3. Hill v. RigginsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Craig McGillan v. Aimee BottorffCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API