Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Miller
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Decided October 9, 1996No. 03-96-00437-CRPublishedCited by 77 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellant stands indicted under the above cause number for the offense of felony theft. By application for writ of habeas corpus, appellant sought to bar prosecution of this indictment on double jeopardy grounds. 1 The district court denied the writ application by written order stating, “The Court, having been presented the Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus ... is of the opinion that the same should not be Granted and that no hearing should be set on the Application ... and the Application is in all things DENIED.” This appeal followed. Tex.R.App. P. 44.
The State moves to dismiss the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ex Parte HargettCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Stephens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Ex Parte RobinsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Ex Parte NoeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Ex Parte MoorehouseCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- Ex parte BowersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001
- Ex Parte Gonzales, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000
- Ex Parte Pool, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2002
- Charles Walter Hill, Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2006
- Ernst v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2004
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.