Megal v. Green Bay Area Visitor & Convention Bureau, Inc.

¶ 26 (dissenting). I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion for four reasons: first, whether constructive notice of an unsafe condition may *813be charged to the arena is a fact question for the jury; second, the majority opinion rewrites the Strack1 exception; third, the majority opinion is improperly driven by policy considerations; and, finally, our standard of review requires reversal of summary judgment.

¶ 27. Generally, to establish liability for an alleged safe-place violation, a plaintiff must prove three elements: (1) the existence of a hazardous condition; (2) that such condition…