Stokes v. Commonwealth

RANDOLPH A. BEALES, Judge.

Sheila Michelle Stokes (appellant) appeals from her conviction of grand larceny under Code § 18.2-95. 1 She contends a fatal variance exists between the allegations of the indictment and the evidence introduced at trial. Appellant also asserts that the trial court erred in admitting affidavits of forgery under the business records exception to the hearsay rule and also in admitting withdrawal slips without a proper foundation. Finally, she challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. For the following reasons, we affirm the conviction.

Standard op Review

On appeal, we…