Craig v. Gage
District Court, W.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
WEST, District Judge.
Plaintiff asserts that the court has jurisdiction as a court of bankruptcy, because the action here is in aid of the United States District Court of Bankruptcy in the state of Missouri. Jurisdiction has not been acquired as a court of bankruptcy, nor as being ancillary to the original bankruptcy proceeding in Missouri. Hull v. Burr, 153 F. 945, a decision by the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, is controlling. It is followed and approved in the following cases: Bardes v. Hawarden Bank, 178 U. S. 524, 20 S. Ct. 1000, 44 L. Ed. 1175; Harris, Trustee, v. First…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bardes v. Hawarden BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Louisville Trust Co. v. ComingorSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Pickens v. RoySupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- First Nat. Bank of Chicago v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Smith v. FlyTexas Supreme Court · 1859
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Colorado Milling & Elevator Co. v. HowbertCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
- (PC) Caruso v. JohnsonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020