State v. Buck
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Per curiam
The several assignments of error brought forward in defendant’s appeal, based upon exceptions noted to ruling of the court during the trial, have been duly considered and found to be without substantial merit.
*435The defendant assigned error in tbe charge of the court in that, in referring to evidence of good character of the defendant the court charged that the jury had the “right to consider” this evidence in passing upon his guilt or innocence, and that the jury also “ought to consider it” as corroborative evidence. It was argued that a distinction was thus made with respect to the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952