Legal Opinion · Dissent

Zurich Insurance Co. v. Rombough

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 21, 1970No. Docket 4,909Published

1DissentJ. H. Gillis, P. J.

In this action for a declaratory judgment, the trial court concluded:

“It is the finding of the court that on the basis of the record in this case the tractor in question was attached to a trailer used to carry property in a business at the time the accident occurred; that the tractor in question was excluded from coverage under policy no. 54-87-120; and that because there is no coverage under the policy there is no obligation on plaintiff to defend defendant Rombough in any claim for damages in docket no. 335.”

I would affirm.

The.defense provision of the insurance contract is clear and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ritchie v. Anchor Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
  2. Guerdon Industries, Inc. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Duval v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1943
  4. American Fidelity Co. v. Deer-Field Valley Grain Co.District Court, D. Vermont · 1942
  5. Economy Mills of Elwell, Inc. v. Motorists Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API