Courtenay v. Wilhoit
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
PAXTON, Judge:
The single issue presented for determination is whether a decree of dissolution of marriage, which incorporates by reference a separation agreement providing for payment of a fixed sum of money in periodic payments, requires interest to be paid on the fixed-sum where the agreement and decree are silent on the issue. The trial court concluded that the fixed-sum does not bear interest. We affirm.
Mary Ann Courtenay and her then-husband, Dr. Jack Wilhoit, entered into an amended separation agreement on June 15, 1978, in which all of their marital and property rights were settled.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Williams v. WestCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1953
- Guthrie v. GuthrieCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1968
- Ridge v. RidgeKentucky Supreme Court · 1978
- Dame v. DameKentucky Supreme Court · 1982
- Stewart v. RaikesKentucky Supreme Court · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Emberton v. GMRI, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2009
- Chesley v. AbbottCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2017
- Stone v. Kentucky Insurance Guaranty Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1995
- Strunk v. LawsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2013
- Doyle v. DoyleMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.