Legal Opinion

Courtenay v. Wilhoit

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided August 19, 1983PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAXTON, Judge:

The single issue presented for determination is whether a decree of dissolution of marriage, which incorporates by reference a separation agreement providing for payment of a fixed sum of money in periodic payments, requires interest to be paid on the fixed-sum where the agreement and decree are silent on the issue. The trial court concluded that the fixed-sum does not bear interest. We affirm.

Mary Ann Courtenay and her then-husband, Dr. Jack Wilhoit, entered into an amended separation agreement on June 15, 1978, in which all of their marital and property rights were settled.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Williams v. WestCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1953
  2. Guthrie v. GuthrieCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1968
  3. Ridge v. RidgeKentucky Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Dame v. DameKentucky Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Stewart v. RaikesKentucky Supreme Court · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Emberton v. GMRI, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Chesley v. AbbottCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2017
  3. Stone v. Kentucky Insurance Guaranty Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1995
  4. Strunk v. LawsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2013
  5. Doyle v. DoyleMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API