Legal Opinion

Callahan v. City of Berkley

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1943No. Docket No. 9, Calendar No. 42,460PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wiest, J,

This suit in equity is by holders of bonds and obligations of the village of Berkley, now city of Berkley, to have decree determining their rights and that of other bondholders like situated. The circuit judge classified the bonds and obligations and limited some to special sources of income and held others general obligations of the city to the extent of charter and statutory authorization. Defendants review by appeal and plaintiffs by cross appeal.

The obligations were issued by the village of Berkley between 1925 and 1929, while operating under the home rule statute and charter…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Pontiac v. DucharmeMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Toebe v. City of MunisingMichigan Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Alan v. Wayne CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  2. City of Hazel Park v. Municipal Finance CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Council of Saginaw v. Saginaw Policemen & Firemen Retirement System TrusteesMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Brimmer v. Village of Elk RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  5. City of Big Rapids v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API