Legal Opinion

Jung Brewing Co. v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 12, 1906PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Case 67 — PROSECUTION AGAINST THE JUNG BREWING COMPANY FOR MAINTAINING A PUBLIC NUISANCE, Appeal from Laurel Circuit Court. H. C, Faulkner, Circuit Judge Defendant convicted and appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

*508Opinion by

Judge Barker.

Affirming.

The appellant corporation, Jung Brewing Company, was indicted by the grand jury of Laurel county, charged with maintaining a public nuisance on its premises in the town of Pittsburg, Laurel county, Ky. Upon trial it was found guilty by the jury, and a fine of $500 inflicted by the verdict.

The evidence on the trial showed that Pittsburg is a small mining town without police or town authorities, situated in a local option district; that some months before the indictment herein was found, the Jung Brewing Company rented the house referred to, which is near the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. TurnerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
  2. Green v. State ex rel. ChathamMississippi Supreme Court · 1952
  3. People v. MontoyaAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API