Legal Opinion

Jenkins v. Barsalou

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 2008No. 32522PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURDICK, Justice.

This case asks the Court to decide whether Appellant Lynn Jenkins complied with the Idaho statutes governing redemption. We hold that he did not, and therefore, we affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment to respondent.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Appellant Lynn Allan Jenkins was one of several people with a mortgage interest in a 1063-acre property known as the Keystone Ranch. The mortgage was initially granted in 1977 to the Wolfley Brothers, a partnership. Numerous conveyances of portions of Keystone Ranch followed which separated the property into…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Riverside Development Co. v. RitchieIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Boughton v. PriceIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Baker v. SullivanIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  4. KEB Enterprises, L.P. v. SmedleyIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Bach v. MillerIdaho Supreme Court · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chavez v. BarrusIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Allied Bail Bonds, Inc. v. County of KootenaiIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Indian Springs v. Terry and Rosanna AndersenIdaho Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API