Central Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. Ingram
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Dissent 1
FONES and BROCK, JJ.,
dissent in separate opinion.
2Dissent · BrockBrock, Justice
I respectfully dissent.
In Associated Dairies, Inc. v. Ray Moss Farms, Inc., 205 Tenn. 268, 326 S.W.2d 458 (1959), this Court held that continued em*38ployment is no consideration for a restrictive covenant imposed after an employment relationship has begun. In Ray Moss, a competitor of the employer, who was in the dairy business, allegedly began to hire the employer’s sales drivers and to use those drivers to solicit the employer’s business. In response, the employer required its drivers, including the defendant, to sign a non-competition…
3Cases cited16 opinions
- Bob Pearsall Motors, Inc. v. Regal Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1975
- Kadis v. . BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Allright Auto Parks, Inc. v. BerryTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
- George W. Kistler, Inc. v. O'BRIENSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Ehlers v. Iowa Warehouse CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.