Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Alabama

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided August 29, 1984No. Civ. 4180PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action by the insurer against the insured to retrieve insurance benefits paid under the subrogation rights of the insurance policy. For the reasons we will state, we affirm.

The facts are not in dispute. On December 12, 1982, Mae Palmer, defendant-appellant, and her husband were involved in an automobile accident. In addition to personal injuries, the appellant suffered out-of-pocket expenses and property damage. Palmer's medical expenses and doctors' fees were paid by Blue Cross-Blue Shield of Alabama, plaintiff-appellee, under a group plan with her employer. The total amount of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Alabama Farm Bureau Mutual Casualty Insurance v. AndersonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1972
  2. Maddox v. DunklinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  3. Alabama Farm Bureau Mutual Casualty Insurance v. WilliamsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commercial Union Ins. Co. v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Ala.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD OF ALA. v. BoldingCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API