Legal Opinion

Holland Furnace Co. v. Hartig

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1914No. Docket No. 44Published

Appeal from Bay; Collins, J. Bill by the Holland Furnace Company against Emil Hartig and another for the enforcement of a mechanics’ lien. From a decree for defendants, complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, C. J.

In this case complainant filed its bill of complaint to foreclose a mechanic’s lien upon certain premises occupied by defendants in Bay City, Mich., for the price and value of furnishing and installing therein a certain furnace, together with all the piping and fitting and material connected therewith, and the labor performed thereon. The title to these premises was in defendant Emil Hartig. The other defendant is his wife, and these premises were occupied by them as their homestead. Complainant, a Michigan corporation, was engaged in the business of manufacturing and installing furnaces.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bauer v. LongMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  2. McAllister v. Des RochersMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  3. McMillan v. SchneiderMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Scott v. KeethMichigan Supreme Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API