Legal Opinion

Beech v. Weber

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided November 11, 1924PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We are of the opinion that plaintiff made out a prima facie case. In Kaufman v. Young, 157 N. Y. Supp. 778, this court stressed the facts that the steps were of slate, and that no oily or greasy substance was used in the cleaning. Here the proof'was that the hallway was cleaned with “ hot soapy water.” The facts in Curtiss v. Lehigh Valley R. R. Co., 233 N. Y. 554, make the situation there clearly distinguishable from that here, and, furthermore, in his dissenting opinion (194 App. Div. 931) II. T. Kellogg, J., stresses the fact that there was no evidence of the use of soap. We believe the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Curtiss v. . Lehigh Valley Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. Kaufman v. YoungAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1916

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gondolfi v. Palisade Holding Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1934
  2. Jacobs v. DanzigerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API