Legal Opinion

PMI Waterford Park, LLC v. Carter

District Court, N.D. California

Decided January 9, 2024No. 4:24-cv-00081Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 PMI WATERFORD PARK, LLC, Case No. 24-cv-00081-NC 11 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AS 12 TO WHY THIS CASE SHOULD v. NOT BE REMANDED TO STATE 13 COURT TOMMY CARTER, and others, 14 Re: ECF 1 Defendants. 15 16 17 Before the Court is Defendants Tommy-Lee Carter and Lisa-Lorraine Willis’ 18 Notice of Removal (“Notice”). ECF 1. However, the underlying state court case appears 19 to be an unlawful detainer action. See id., Exhibit. Because such a claim does not appear 20 to confer federal jurisdiction, the Court ORDERS…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. v. HensonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Hunter v. Philip Morris USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. Provincial Gov't of Marinduque v. Placer Dome, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. California ex rel. Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Coffey v. Ripple Labs Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API