Miller v. State ex rel. Russell
Mississippi Supreme Court
1DissentSmith, C. J.
It is always a source of regret, to me to he unable to concur in the conclusion reached by a majority of my Associates in the decision of any case, which regret is here more pronounced than usual for the reason that the construction placed by the majority of my Associates on the section of th¿ Constitution here in question confers upon the legislature the unlimited power to support the public schools which I think it should have, but to so concur would cause me to violate what seems to me the plain language of the Constitution, as well as some of the most elementary rules for the construction…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Parks v. WestTexas Supreme Court · 1908
- State ex rel. Greaves v. HenryMississippi Supreme Court · 1905
- Commonwealth v. International Harvester Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
- Sill v. . the Village of CorningNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
- State ex rel. Murphy v. BarnesSupreme Court of Florida · 1888
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.