Legal Opinion
In Re Fortenbury
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 3, 1940No. Crim. 3317Published
1Opinion of the Court
38 Cal.App.2d 284 (1940)
In the Matter of the Application of CARL D. FORTENBURY for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.
Crim. No. 3317.
California Court of Appeals. Second Appellate District, Division One.
April 3, 1940.
Gallagher, Wirin & Johnson for Petitioner.
Buron Fitts, District Attorney, and Jere J. Sullivan, Deputy District Attorney, for Respondent.
Doran, J.
Duly cited with contempt of court for the violation of a temporary restraining order, the petitioner herein, after a hearing on such citation, was adjudged guilty and fined five dollars with the alternative of one day in the county jail for each…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Haguer v. Committee for Industrial OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Schneider v. State (Town of Irvington)Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Lovell v. City of GriffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Whitney v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- De Jonge v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.