Legal Opinion

Parks v. Thomas

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 10, 1919PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Logan Circuit Court, Southern District; James Cochran, Judge; STATEMENT OF FACTS. The parties to this litigation are coterminous proprietors of tracts of land which are made irregular in shape by Booneville creek, a tortuous stream running through the land, or, rather, forming the boundary of both tracts. Both parties deraign their title from one James Boss, who at one time owned the land on both sides of the creek at the point in controversy.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Logan Circuit Court, Southern District; James Cochran, Judge; STATEMENT OF FACTS. The parties to this litigation are coterminous proprietors of tracts of land which are made irregular in shape by Booneville creek, a tortuous stream running through the land, or, rather, forming the boundary of both tracts. Both parties deraign their title from one James Boss, who at one time owned the land on both sides of the creek at the point in controversy. Boss sold the land east of the creek to one J. P. Henderson and this is the land owned by appellee Thomas at the time of the institution of…

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, J.,

(after stating the facts). Appellant complains of the admission of the testimony of Sweeney to the effect that he did not bny or claim the gravel bed in controversy; that he did not buy or claim any portion of ground across Booneville creek from the west where appellant cut appellee’s fence, and that he did not buy or claim or take into his possession any portion of the ground on the east side of the creek where the fence was cut; the ground of the objection being that the conveyances are the best evidence of what any vendee took by his deed. It will be observed, however, that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Welch v. WelchSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  2. Hughes Bros. v. RedusSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  3. Seawell v. YoungSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  4. Richardson v. TaylorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1885
  5. Waldroop v. RuddellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. HerringSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  2. United States v. BartholomewDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1956
  3. Fort Smith Iron & Steel Mills v. Southern Round Bale Press Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  4. Auston v. LoydDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1982
  5. Beichslich v. BeichslichSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API