Legal Opinion

Spatola v. United States

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided July 9, 1990No. 89-CV-4056 (JRB), 89-643-M (JLC)PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM-DECISION & ORDER

BARTELS, District Judge.

In general, United States extradition law imposes several substantive requirements on all requests for extradition before they may be granted. Three of these requirements are that: (1) the offense be “extraditable” under the applicable treaty; (2) the offense satisfy so-called “dual criminality;” and (3) there be probable cause that the relator committed the crime for which he is sought. M. Bassiouni, International Extradition 319 et seq. (1987). In this case the Court is called upon to decide, as against these requirements, whether the…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Reid v. CovertSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Oetjen v. Central Leather Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  5. Missouri v. HollandSupreme Court of the United States · 1920

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Paolo Lo Duca v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  2. Rosario Spatola v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  3. Lobue v. ChristopherDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1995
  4. Giancarlo Parretti v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  5. Giancarlo PARRETTI, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API