Seigneuret v. Fahey
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of tbe district court for Sibley county, Macdonald, J., presiding, refusing a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtBerry, J.
This is an action in the nature of ejectment. The plaintiff is found to be the owner in fee of the land in controversy. The links in defendant’s chain of title are— First, a tax deed running to one Bertrang; and, second, a deed from Bertrang to defendant. The tax deed was irregular and void upon its face. The deed from Bertrang was founded upon the consideration of $400, expressed therein, and in fact paid by defendant. It purported to convey the land, the words of conveyance being “grant, bargain, sell, release, and quitclaim.” The defendant went into possession of the land on receiving and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Berkey v. JuddSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
- Edgerton v. BirdWisconsin Supreme Court · 1858
- Russell v. Erwin's Adm'rSupreme Court of Alabama · 1861
- Hodges v. EddySupreme Court of Vermont · 1865
- Brooks v. BruynIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Board of Trustees of Ripon College v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Henslin v. WingenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Wheeler v. MerrimanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- McLellan v. OmodtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- Rundel v. Boone CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.