Legal Opinion

United States v. Kenneth Paulk

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 24, 2009No. 08-50229Published

1Opinion of the Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 08-50229 Plaintiff-Appellee, v.  D.C. No. 2:92-cr-00738-TJH KENNETH LAMONT PAULK, OPINION Defendant-Appellant.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Terry J. Hatter, District Judge, Presiding Submitted February 2, 2009* Pasadena, California Filed June 24, 2009 Before: Harry Pregerson, Susan P. Graber, and Kim McLane Wardlaw, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam Opinion *The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. HoodCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
  3. United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  4. United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API