United States v. Kenneth Paulk
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 08-50229 Plaintiff-Appellee, v. D.C. No. 2:92-cr-00738-TJH KENNETH LAMONT PAULK, OPINION Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Terry J. Hatter, District Judge, Presiding Submitted February 2, 2009* Pasadena, California Filed June 24, 2009 Before: Harry Pregerson, Susan P. Graber, and Kim McLane Wardlaw, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam Opinion *The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. HoodCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.